Mrs. Warman I Presume

One of the enduring mysteries surrounding the assorted Richard Warman defamation cases against assorted Canadian bloggers has been the assumption by the defendants that our hero only had access to a single computer the hard drive of which has now been independently examined.
After all, the Hate Sniffer was, at the time married to Lise Warman for a couple of years. In this modern world was it not possible that Lise had a computer at home as well? Up until quite recently that was merely a pretty good hunch. But I was poking about on an entirely unrelated subject and came across Richard and Lise’s testimony in the William White case (the odious White Supremacist who was convicted, on appeal, of soliciting the murder of the Hate-Sniffer in Chief.)
Let’s go to the transcript of Lise Warman’s testimony:

Q Good afternoon, Ms. Warman. Would you introduce yourself
2 to the jurors.
3 A Certainly. My name is Lise Warman, and I am Richard
4 Warman’s spouse.
5 Q You may want to pull that microphone a bit closer so
6 everyone can hear you.
7 Where do you live?
8 A I live in Ottawa, Canada.
9 Q And you’ve been married to Richard Warman since 2001?
10 A That’s correct.
11 Q What do you do for a living?
12 A I’m a lawyer. I am an assistant Crown attorney, which is
13 equivalent of assistant district attorney for you. So I’m a
14 criminal prosecutor and I prosecute offenders.
15 Q What type of cases do you prosecute?
16 A We have a criminal code in Canada, so we prosecute
17 everything that’s a criminal code, including theft, all the
18 way up to the murder cases. We don’t do drugs or federal
19 statutes.
20 Q What do you specialize in?
21 A I specialize in Internet child exploitation, sexual
22 assault. We do everything, but those are mostly my areas
23 of –
(you can find the reference here but I can’t get the link to the transcript to work. I have it if anyone wants it.)

So, now there is more than merely a hunch – Mrs. Warman specifically prosecuted cases of Internet Child Exploitation. In other words, the nature of her job meant that she did very much the same sort of thing as her husband except, of course, she was prosecuting actual internet criminals under the Criminal Code. (And good for her say I.)
However, it does raise some interesting and, I suspect, important questions. First, did Mrs. W. have a computer at home for work or simply because she was a wired up kinda gal? Second, did the Warmans trade tips on how best to engage their respective prey? Third, why have none of the defendants in the assorted Cools related defamation cases sought to examine Mrs. W’s computer (assuming, rather plausibly, she had one) to determine if hubby might have been using it as a back up/cut out machine? I am sure more computer savvy people than I will have further questions one of which might well be whether Mrs. W’s computer shared the same IP that Bernard Klatt swore the Cools post came from?
And, while we tease out these possibilities, let’s hope Connie and FreeDominion prevail tomorrow in motions court in the Do’s matter. Apparently Connie would like a jury trial. Which would be fascinating. (Oddly, I gather that the Hate Sniffer in Chief’s counsel are not so keen on letting the hoi polloi nobble the judge with messy findings of fact.
UPDATE: Free Dominion Wins a Round:
Connie writes,

Both sides said that they did. So, she basically said that she was going to accept our amended Statement of Defence as it was written. Then, on the issue of the jury notice, she said that the other side had not provided her with any evidence that they would be prejudiced if she allowed us to file a jury notice. Since there was nothing in their evidence that showed they would be prejudiced, it was clear she was going to allow our jury notice, too.
Then, she asked the lawyers if they wanted to take half an hour to talk and see if they could come to a resolution. Once we met, the other side immediately agreed to consent to the updated Statement of Defence and to us filing a jury notice. Costs will be awarded at the end of the trial. We agreed to allow them two more hours to cross-examine me since our Statement of Defence is now considerably longer and more detailed. We responded to that by asking for two more hours to cross-examine Richard Warman. They did not consent to that, and the judge didn’t think the law allowed for it, so we let it go. It’s not like he answers questions, anyway, so it’s not a big deal.
The big deal is that we got what we wanted in the motion. Exactly what we wanted. We now have a kick-ass Statement of Defence, and this trial is going to a jury! free dominion

I can think of nothing better for Freedom of Speech in general than to have the Witch Sniffer before a jury. Arrogance and self righteousness tend to go over rather badly with juries.




Sites with information on Richard Warman

Richard Warman: http://www.richardwarman.com
David Icke: http://www.davidicke.com
Ezra Levant: http://ezralevant.com
AntiRacist Canada: http://antiracist-canada.blogspot.com
Freedominion: http://www.freedominion.ca
Richard Warman: http://www.davidicke.com/articles/coverups-mainmenu-65/13163-richard-warman
Marc Lemire v. CHRC: http://www.freedomsite.org/legal
SmallDeadAnimals: http://www.smalldeadanimals.com
Maximum Disruption: http://maximum-disruption.blogspot.com
Five Feet of Fury: http://www.fivefeetoffury.com
Documenting the "Maximum Disruption" Campaign of Richard WARMAN: http://richardwarman.wordpress.com
Blazing Cat Fur: http://blazingcatfur.blogspot.ca
Richard Warman Hates Freedom: http://richardwarmanhatesfreedom.blogspot.com

Human Rights Tribunal: Government Lawyer Richard Warman’s conduct “disappointing and disturbing”

The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal issued a stunning ruling today, calling the conduct of Richard Warman, Canada’s most prolific human rights complainant, “disappointing and disturbing”.

Tribunal Chair Edward Lustig condemned Warman – who holds himself out as a human rights activist – for his membership in neo-Nazi organizations and ripped into him for his frequent anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi rants. The Tribunal effectively accused Warman himself of breaking the law – pointing out that Warman’s online anti-Semitism could quite possibly expose Jews to even more hatred and contempt. That just happens to be the offence Warman claimed he was trying to enforce. And, in perhaps the most damaging finding, the Tribunal pointed out that Warman at first did not answer questions truthfully – effectively calling him an attempted perjurer.

It is the most incredible ruling I have ever read from a human rights tribunal, and it discredits Warman, his enablers at the Canadian Human Rights Commission, and section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (the censorship provision).

There have been dark days for the censors and bullies at the CHRC over the past year – like Bell Canada’s uncontradicted testimony that CHRC staff hacked a private citizen’s Internet account or Richard Moon’s surprise recommendation to scrap section 13.

But those were merely political developments. This is a quasi-judicial Tribunal ruling. It is not a consultant’s view or a pundit’s opinion or a mere PR blunder. It is the law. Richard Warman is a discredited man who promotes anti-Semitic filth online with no good excuse. Warman’s own favourite Tribunal says so.

Warman is done.

After this ruling, I would be surprised if he ever files a section 13 complaint again. Scratch that: of course he will. But the CHRC will never accept his complaints again – Jennifer Lynch, their chief commissar, is a censor too but she has a sense of political survival. She’s in enough trouble already with a Justice Department review and a Parliamentary Committee investigation getting under way, not to mention the Prime Minister’s Office breathing down her neck. The days of Lynch running with Warman’s cases – and paying his expenses, which she continued to do even after he left the CHRC – are over.

I wonder if even Bernie “Burny” Farber, Official Jewry’s censor-in-chief, will put some distance between him and Warman. You’d think Burny would have given a damn about Warman’s anti-Semitic filth – the secular Tribunal did, but not Burny, even though fighting anti-Semitism is supposed to be his beat. But Burny’s moral compass has been off for a long time – he denounces Jew-loving Christian Zionists like Kathy Shaidle, but defends Jew-bashing radicals like Haroon Siddiqui.

But what now for Warman? How does this poor assessment of his integrity affect his job as “Director of Special Grievances – Enquiries and Investigations” at the Department of National Defence? Every single criticism the Tribunal Chair makes in this ruling touches on Warman’s job at the mini-human rights commission that he runs in the bosom of DND. If I were a soldier hauled before Warman, the first thing I would do is file a special grievance against the special grievance director – and all I'd need was a photocopy of the Tribunal’s ruling.

All of Warman’s showy pretenses of being a human rights crusader have been reduced to rubble. The Tribunal specifically took on Warman’s thin excuses for why he joined neo-Nazi groups and engaged in vicious anti-Semitism himself. The Tribunal listened to Warman’s smug rationalizations – the excuses that Jennifer Lynch and Warman’s other enablers at the CHRC have bought for years – and threw them in the garbage. At paragraph 63:

I do not see any acceptable reason for Mr. Warman to have participated on the Stormfront or Vanguard sites, since there appears to be ample easily obtained messages on these sites available without his involvement. Moreover, it is possible that his activity in this regard, could have precipitated further hate messages in response. His explanation for including other hate messages in his postings by mistake seems very weak to me.

I’ve been writing about Warman’s online bigotry for about a year now, but with few exceptions that explosive story has been reported only by bloggers, not the mainstream media. To see his filth reprinted at great length in a Tribunal ruiling – as it was in this case – is startling to me. And, mirabile dictu, the National Post reprinted Warman’s anti-Semitic rant for the entire nation to see, too. I’m stunned by how far Warman’s reputation has crumbled in the past year.

The Tribunal was clearly upset with Warman’s entrapment and impersonation. But it also mentioned his difficulty telling the truth. Here’s an example, at paragraph 57:

Contrary to Mr. Warman's Statement of Particulars, there is no evidence that the impugned conduct by the Respondents has continued to the present time. Instead it appears to have been discontinued well before the complaints were instituted. To a certain extent, there would not appear to be anything to remediate.

Warman claimed that the people he was going after had been continuously publishing their anti-Semitic comments, when in fact the Tribunal ruled that they had stopped doing so before Warman even filed his complaints. Normal people would say “what a liar!”. The Tribunal simply said that the truth was “contrary to Mr. Warman’s Statement of Particulars.”

But that’s just a trifle compared to this, at paragraph 59:

During his cross-examination, Mr. Warman admitted (after initially denying) that he had participated in communicating messages on Internet Websites similar to the Northern Alliance Website utilizing pseudonyms such as "Pogue Mahone" and "Axetogrind".

Cross-examination is under oath, of course. Lying under oath is called perjury. The Tribunal noted that, at first, Warman didn’t tell the truth. The Tribunal didn’t use the word “lie”; it just pointed out that Warman’s original answers under oath weren’t true. Again, regular people would say “what a liar!” It’s not the first time for Warman.

This hearing was supposed to be about Jason Ouwendyk and the Northern Alliance. It’s no surprise that they were convicted, maintaining the CHRT’s 100% conviction rate for section 13 offences. And, also unsurprising, was the fact that neither defendant had a lawyer – more than 90% of section 13 targets are too poor to afford one and, unlike real courts, legal aid is not provided.

But look at paragraph 56 in the ruling. Warman made three demands: that Ouwendyk and the Northern Alliance be ordered not to publish “hate speech” on the Internet anymore; that they be ordered to pay a fine of $7,500 and “compensation” to Warman of $6,000.

The first demand was granted – the Tribunal gave a cease and desist order, telling Ouwendyk and the Northern Alliance to stop doing what they used to do. But as the Tribunal pointed out, they had stopped doing so years ago. So it was meaningless.

Warman’s demands for cash were refused by the Chair – no fines, and no bounty to Warman.

So what’s the net result of all this?

Warman filed his complaint in January, 2006 – so this has been grinding through the human rights industry for more than three years. Countless hundreds of thousands of tax dollars have been spent, first by the CHRC to investigate the case, and then by the Tribunal to hear the case.

And in the end a website that hasn’t even been on the Internet in years is “banned”.

I guess this is part of the “stimulus package” to make work for busy-bodies, lawyers and bureaucrats.

There are a lot of losers in all of this – the taxpayer; common sense; freedom of speech, including freedom of speech to say offensive things; natural justice and rule of law.

But Warman is clearly the biggest loser. Before this ruling came out, we already knew that Ouwendyk and the Northern Alliance were racist. Nothing’s changed for them at all, other than their time was wasted for three years.

But Warman’s reputation has been devastated.

That’s of concern to him as I’ve outlined above. But it’s also of concern to him for his countless defamation nuisance suits, including against me, Kathy, Kate, the National Post and others.

We all have our defences – truth, fair comment, etc.

But now we have something much more powerful. We have a legal finding that the man who claims we hurt his reputation, doesn’t have a good reputation in the first place.

He “diminishe[d]” it. His conduct is “disturbing”. As a so-called human rights activist, he’s “disappointing.” His reasons for writing anti-Semitic filth are not “acceptable”. His excuse for reprinting other people’s filth is “very weak”.

Try taking that to a defamation court.

***

P.S. Who is this Edward Lustig who – despite continuing the CHRT’s 100% conviction rate – spoke such common sense about Warman’s discreditable conduct? He was appointed by the Conservatives a year ago. But looking at his brief resume, there’s something different: he didn’t come from the grievance industry. He spent 27 years as lawyer for the City of Niagara Falls. In other words, doing normal legal work, not radical politics masquerading as the law. Lustig actually sits on the CHRT part-time – he still practices law – not “human rights law” or “critical Marxist theory” law, but real estate law, commercial and municipal planning law. No wonder he was appalled by Warman’s filthy mouth – he hasn’t had the politically correct training to get the nuances when Warman said that Irwin Cotler was Jewish “scum”.

I’m not saying that section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act can be workable in the hands of reasonable men – it can’t be. It’s an unfair law that violates our constitutional rights. And, despite the laughable impotence of the order against the respondents here, it’s still unconstitutional. But it’s refreshing that someone in the entire human rights industry had the independence and common sense to finally blow the whistle on one of Canada’s most abusive legal and political bullies, Richard Warman. Or as he is now legally known: the disgraced Richard Warman.

Sites with information on Richard Warman

Richard Warman: http://www.richardwarman.com
David Icke: http://www.davidicke.com
Ezra Levant: http://ezralevant.com
AntiRacist Canada: http://antiracist-canada.blogspot.com
Freedominion: http://www.freedominion.ca
Richard Warman: http://www.davidicke.com/articles/coverups-mainmenu-65/13163-richard-warman
Marc Lemire v. CHRC: http://www.freedomsite.org/legal
SmallDeadAnimals: http://www.smalldeadanimals.com
Maximum Disruption: http://maximum-disruption.blogspot.com
Five Feet of Fury: http://www.fivefeetoffury.com
Documenting the "Maximum Disruption" Campaign of Richard WARMAN: http://richardwarman.wordpress.com
Blazing Cat Fur: http://blazingcatfur.blogspot.ca
Richard Warman Hates Freedom: http://richardwarmanhatesfreedom.blogspot.com
 

 

compiled a list of the "Maximum Disruption" activities of Richard Warman

Marc Lemire has compiled a list of the "Maximum Disruption" activities of Richard Warman and posted them on his blog. It is well worth a look. You will be shocked when you see the full list of his "legal work", all in one place!

http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

A FULL copy of Richard Warman's speech to the notorious Anti-Racist Action is available here: http://www.richardwarman.com/ARA_connection/WarmanSpeechtoARA-6July2005.pdf  Read it before he gets it taken down!

Sites with information on Richard Warman

Richard Warman: http://www.richardwarman.com
David Icke: http://www.davidicke.com
Ezra Levant: http://ezralevant.com
AntiRacist Canada: http://antiracist-canada.blogspot.com
Freedominion: http://www.freedominion.ca
Richard Warman: http://www.davidicke.com/articles/coverups-mainmenu-65/13163-richard-warman
Marc Lemire v. CHRC: http://www.freedomsite.org/legal
SmallDeadAnimals: http://www.smalldeadanimals.com
Maximum Disruption: http://maximum-disruption.blogspot.com
Five Feet of Fury: http://www.fivefeetoffury.com
Documenting the "Maximum Disruption" Campaign of Richard WARMAN: http://richardwarman.wordpress.com
Blazing Cat Fur: http://blazingcatfur.blogspot.ca
Richard Warman Hates Freedom: http://richardwarmanhatesfreedom.blogspot.com
 

 

Richard Warman a racist bigot

What was posted by Warman

“Not only is Canadian Senator Anne Cools is a Negro, she is also an immigrant! And she is also one helluva preachy c*nt. She does NOT belong in my Canada. My Anglo-Germanic people were here before there was a Canada and her kind have jumped in, polluted our race, and forced their bullshit down our throats. Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their place… And that place was NOT in public! Posted: Sep. 5, 2003

---

FreeDominion
Is Richard Warman a racist bigot, or was he "just following orders" issued by his masters at the Canadian Human Rights Commission when he posted the headlined message above on a Freedomsite forum on September 5, 2003? Whatever the answer, the same CHRC that has ruled Bible verses to be hate speech doesn't seem to consider these words to be a problem.

But they are a big problem, for both Richard Warman and the CHRC, and the rest of what he wrote only makes matters worse.

“Not only is Canadian Senator Anne Cools is a Negro, she is also an immigrant!
And she is also one helluva preachy c*nt.
She does NOT belong in my Canada. My Anglo-Germanic people were here before
there was a Canada and her kind have jumped in, polluted our race, and forced
their bullshit down our throats.
Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their place…
And that place was NOT in public!

It may be mere coincidence that Richard Warman is in fact an Anglo-German, but it is not likely a coincidence at all that the owner of the website where Richard Warman posted this racist screed against Sen. Anne Cools came under attack by the CHRC shortly after Richard Warman began his complaint-less investigation there.

Complaint-less investigations by the CHRC have been in the news lately because information has surfaced concerning CHRC operative Dean Steacy and his official exploits as 'Jadewarr'. But compared to his colleague Richard Warman, Dean Steacy is a piker. Richard Warman enters a forum swinging as '90sAREover'.

In testimony beginning January 29, 2007 Richard Warman admitted under oath in Canadian Human Rights Tribunal hearing (Case T1073/5405) that he was, in fact, the poster named 'lucy' who had registered on the Freedomsite (and other) forums. What he neglected to add was that 'lucy' was not his first Freedomsite screen name. He failed to mention that his complaint-less investigation of Freedomsite actually began two months before 'lucy' hit the scene, it began when he registered on the Freedomsite under the screen name '90sAREover'.

Another miscalculation by Richard Warman was the technical expertise of the target of this particular setup operation. Marc Lemire is a techie, a networking nerd, so it was not much of a problem for him to find information on both 'lucy' and '90sAREover' in the Freedomsite database.

The table reproduced below shows information found in the Freedomsite database comparing Richard Warman's admitted 'lucy' identity (left column) to information about '90sAREover' (right column). This table infomation was gathered by expert technology witness Bernard Klatt and submitted as evidence to a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on February 8, 2007.

Admitted Richard Warman/lucy info	90sAREover info
IP address = 66.185.84.204	IP address = 66.185.84.204
ISP = Rogers Cable	ISP = Rogers Cable
OS = Windows 98	OS = Windows 98
Browser = Mozilla 4.0 compatible MSIE 6.0	Browser = Mozilla 4.0 compatible MSIE 6.0
ID = lucy (lucyaubrack@yahoo.ca)	ID = 90sAREover (rob_m_simpson@hotmail.com)
setup using anonymous email account	setup using anonymous email account
on obscure message limited-interest board	on obscure message limited-interest board
logged onto message board only twice	logged onto message board only twice
very short usage time (120 min)	very short usage time (14 min)
no optional info supplied	no optional info supplied
created for single purpose	created for single purpose
used Nov. 11, 15, 23, 2003	used Sep. 5, 2003

Mr. Klatt concludes in Paragraph 71 of his affidavit:

"Based on the information provided in this affidavit, in my expert opinion, I concluded that the Freedomsite message board user accounts "90sAREover" and "lucy" are those of Richard Warman and that Richard Warman was the poster of the message headed "Cools don't belong in our Senate" posted September 5, 2003."

There is also no doubt that the CHRC was aware of this internet posting by 90sAREover because it was a part of the original complaint filed by Richard Warman, when referred to tribunal. But this posting is no longer a part of the CHRC complaint against Lemire, the CHRC dropped it from the complaint the day after Mr. Lemire won a decision to subpoena Rogers' internet records.

This posting by 90sAREover would be a slam dunk in a real court of law, so why did the CHRC drop it from the complaint?

This story is far from over because the attacks on Marc Lemire by the CHRC are ongoing and with no end in sight, as are the attacks on many other Canadians by this government agency. This story is also far from being completely told. More ugly twists and turns will be revealed as those at the center of it all give us leave to report the details.

Slowly but surely the truth is coming out.

And it isn't pretty.

Sites with information on Richard Warman

Richard Warman: http://www.richardwarman.com
David Icke: http://www.davidicke.com
Ezra Levant: http://ezralevant.com
AntiRacist Canada: http://antiracist-canada.blogspot.com
Freedominion: http://www.freedominion.ca
Richard Warman: http://www.davidicke.com/articles/coverups-mainmenu-65/13163-richard-warman
Marc Lemire v. CHRC: http://www.freedomsite.org/legal
SmallDeadAnimals: http://www.smalldeadanimals.com
Maximum Disruption: http://maximum-disruption.blogspot.com
Five Feet of Fury: http://www.fivefeetoffury.com
Documenting the "Maximum Disruption" Campaign of Richard WARMAN: http://richardwarman.wordpress.com
Blazing Cat Fur: http://blazingcatfur.blogspot.ca
Richard Warman Hates Freedom: http://richardwarmanhatesfreedom.blogspot.com
 

 

Richard Warman posting about Canadian Senator Anne Cools

Richard Warman’s “maximum disruption” libel cases
reveal too much
FreeDominion
Richard Warman’s strategy of maximum disruption of the lives of those who hold political opinions unapproved by Richard Warman included many tactics. He associated with violent brownshirts like those from the ARA, with painfully obvious obliqueness he counselled physical assault on his targets, he tried to frame his victims by planting evidence against them on their websites and then dragging them into a CHRT kangaroo court for summary convictions. Suing individuals in civil court was also one of his tactics, as can be seen with his attempt to silence Free Dominion via his lawsuit against Mark and Connie Fournier.

Warman’s suit against Free Dominion was likely motivated by the fact that some posters at FD had begun posting hints about the operations of Richard Warman. He understood better than any of us how much he had to hide. In the end, it was this civil suit that initiated his downfall. Instead of succumbing to fear we began to look even deeper into Richard Warman’s activities.

Richard Warman lived in his own little world where he was surrounded by pro-censorship organizations like the CHRC and the CJC. In this tight little club he received awards and accolades for selling off the liberty of all Canadians. But now the country knows what he was really doing and we are learning very much about the agencies and political philosophies that were supporting his operations. And the more we learn, the dirtier they all become.

Free Dominion published transcript evidence that Richard Warman was indeed Lucy and that Lucy and "90sAREover" (of the Anne Cools/n*gger c*nt post) were using the same computer and the same IP address. Now more IP evidence has arisen as a result of Warman’s libel complaint against Paul Fromm.

In Warman v. Fromm, Volume 1 of the Book of Documents – Tab 4 Richard Warman submits as evidence a document written by Paul Fromm titled, “Jewish Lobby being re-organized”. Richard Warman copied this document on October 15, 2003 from the URL http://www.freedomsite.org/pipermail/fs_announce/2003/001248.html.

A check of the freedomsite log files for the event in question produced this result:

Quote:

wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com - - [15/Oct/2003:20:46:13 -0400] "GET /pipermail/fs_announce/2003/001248.html HTTP/1.1" 200 18740 "http://www.freedomsite.org/pipermail/fs_announce/2003/date.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)"

What this shows is that Richard Warman printed out the document:

Quote:

Using hostname: wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com On: 15/Oct/2003:20:46:13 (8:46PM) He accessed the document by clicking on a link at: http://www.freedomsite.org/pipermail/fs_announce/2003/date.html (known as the referrer) And was using: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)

In 2003, Mr. Lemire was running TWO servers. One of them ran the message board (a Windows-based computer), and a totally separate Linux box was running the website. The above log entry is from the SECOND server, and is, thus, a secondary source to confirm exactly what Warman was doing.

SAME IP ADDRESS WARMAN USED ON THE MESSAGE BOARD

The second server that Lemire was running logged the visitors by either hostname or IP address. As you can see above it was the HOSTNAME that was logged.

The hostname is: wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com

That hostname matches exactly the IP address used by Warman on the message board when he registered as Lucy…which is also the IP address used in the notorious Cools post.

66.185.84.204 = [ wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com ]

You can verify this yourself on your own computer by doing this:

Click on Start button.
Click on RUN
In the box type: cmd (then click OK)
(a black DOS window will open)
Then type this exactly as I have it: nslookup wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com


You should see this:

C:\>nslookup wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
*** Can't find server name for address 192.168.1.1: Non-existent domain
*** Default servers are not available
Server: UnKnown
Address: 192.168.1.1

Non-authoritative answer:
Name: wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
Address: 66.185.84.204


So here is the new timeline:

September 5, 2003: Richard Warman had the IP address of: 66.185.84.204 (Expert witness Bernard Klatt testified on this) and posted the message against Senator Anne Cools.

October 15, 2003: Richard Warman had the IP address of: 66.185.84.204. Printed material to be used in the Paul Fromm Libel case. (Book of documents – Volume 1 – Tab 3 and 4)

November 11, 15 and 23rd, 2003: Richard Warman had the IP address of: 66.185.84.204 (Warman testified he visited the Freedomsite on these dates – see page 1 of the complaint form filed by Warman against Lemire)

Click Here to see the evidence that is being submitted to the tribunal.

Sites with information on Richard Warman

Richard Warman: http://www.richardwarman.com
David Icke: http://www.davidicke.com
Ezra Levant: http://ezralevant.com
AntiRacist Canada: http://antiracist-canada.blogspot.com
Freedominion: http://www.freedominion.ca
Richard Warman: http://www.davidicke.com/articles/coverups-mainmenu-65/13163-richard-warman
Marc Lemire v. CHRC: http://www.freedomsite.org/legal
SmallDeadAnimals: http://www.smalldeadanimals.com
Maximum Disruption: http://maximum-disruption.blogspot.com
Five Feet of Fury: http://www.fivefeetoffury.com
Documenting the "Maximum Disruption" Campaign of Richard WARMAN: http://richardwarman.wordpress.com
Blazing Cat Fur: http://blazingcatfur.blogspot.ca
Richard Warman Hates Freedom: http://richardwarmanhatesfreedom.blogspot.com
 

 

Nazi Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Attacks upon Freedom of Speech

The actions of the entity known as Richard Warman are definitely ones that Canadians should be more aware of. Given his propensity for decades of ongoing attacks against freedom of expression here in Canada I feel it behooves all Canadians to take a closer look at his conduct. In doing so people ought to ask themselves how in God’s name our legal system could permit someone like this to go on year after year running amok and getting away with his endless attempts at exploiting Canadian laws for the benefit of his own selfish gain, not to mention the tacit support given to those foreign Jewish lobby groups such as B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress; Zionist organizations hell-bent on silencing any and all legitimate criticism of their and Israel’s historic wrongs against humanity.

Warman of course is one of the two B’nai Brith Canada operatives who has been on my ass since 2007, doing his damnedest to shut down www.radicalpress.com and drive me into the hole financially. He’s not alone though for no man is an island unto himself when it comes to the “Jewish hate speech” racket that the Zionist and their lobbyist organizations have created and exploited throughout all the nations of the West since WWII in their ongoing efforts to cover up Zion’s endless crimes.

Back in 2007 when I was first charged with a sec. 13(1) “hate crime” complaint by Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada Warman wasn’t named on any of the documents. Had it not been for the fact that I was able to obtain a leaked email I would not have been aware of his surreptitious involvement in my case.

When word got out that I had received this Bolshevik/Zionist “show trial” accusative “complaint” document in my mailbox on November 20, 2007 my local newspaper, the Quesnel Cariboo Observer was interested in doing an interview with me on the subject. Having been a regular contributor to its Letters to the Editor section in the local community paper for over 35 years, plus a bi-weekly columnist, the locals in the community were obviously curious about this sudden complaint from the world’s largest Jewish lobby group.
On January 13, 2008 the Observer ran an article entitled, “TOPHAM VIEWS UNDER ATTACK: B’nai Brith claims anti-Jewish writings“. In the article was expressed my viewpoint and why I felt that B’nai Brith Canada was acting the way it was.

As soon as that story hit the streets Harry Abrams of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada was on the telephone from Victoria, B.C. doing his utmost to browbeat and intimidate the journalist who had interviewed me for the article. It’s not the first time that ol’ Harry was found to be extremely abusive when dealing with those who he felt were not behaving as good goyim ought to behave when it comes to the questionable machinations of the Jewish state of Israel. Of course the journalist was not impressed one iota with Abrams’ manner of communication.

Soon afterwards Abrams wrote a response to the Letters section of the Observer wherein he did his best to bring up the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and use that document as some sort of proof that I was posting hate literature against those of the Jewish faith. At the same time he basically demanded that I should remove all posts that he felt were unacceptable and if I did so then that would be the end of the matter. Of course his wishes never came true and beside, given the way that his co-conspirator Richard Warman operates, it’s highly doubtful that had I kowtowed to Abrams’ request that the matter would have ended. As we know from Warman’s relentless attacks upon Marc Lemire, AFTER MARC WILLINGLY REMOVED WHATEVER OFFENDING POSTS WERE ON A WEBSITE RAN BY HIM, complying with their Orwellian demands only makes these censorship control freaks that much more inclined to sink their fangs deeper into their perceived victims.

Following Abrams’ letter to the Editor which was published on January 27, 2008 the newspaper was flooded with letters of support for me that came from around the world. This was just too much for the cheeky Cheka twins, Abrams & Warman, and soon thereafter the owner and publisher of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer, David Black of Black Press (not associated with Conrad Black) received a letter from these two Zionist agents threatening his company with a law suit should it continue to publish any more articles related to the sec. 13 complaint that Abrams had laid against me via the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC). Warman’s and Abrams’ argument was that the sec. 13(1) complaint was before the CHRC and no decision had yet been made so it was illegal for the Quesnel Cariboo Observer to be publishing anything pertaining to the matter. Of course, like all things that the Zionists say and do, it was pure bullshit.

There are NO legal restrictions in reporting on matters related to the machinations of the Zionist-controlled Canadian Human Rights Commission nor its accessory in crime, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. Both these Zionist infested orgs are considered to be quasi-judicial in nature and not subject to the same restrictions as the official Canadian Judicial System (even though it too is just as infested as the others with pro-Zionist sycophants).

And so the upshot of all of this was that Black Press decided it wouldn’t stand up for freedom of speech or to the Jewish lobby and ended up bending to the pressure of these two snivelling censorship snakes and from then on until June of this year a veil of silence hung over my six year long battle with these haters of free expression. That is why you will not be able to find the articles noted above except on my website where I was able to post them prior to their censorship by Black Press.

I’m writing this background information as an aid in understanding just how insane the court system has become since it’s been co-oped by the Jewish lobbyists and their pro-Zionist lawyers and judges who inevitably put the desires of Israel and the racist ideology of Zionism first and foremost when it comes to upholding the supposed rights and freedoms of all Canadians to expressing their views on the Internet.
When I was arrested back in May of 2012 Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM made a big deal out of trying to convince me that their unit was going to be investigating these charges in a wholly new and unbiased manner and were not planning on bringing into the equation all of the past dealings that I had with these two bozos who had just laid the second sec. 319(2) charge against me; one that resulted in being jailed, losing my firearms and my computers and all of my electronic files and email going back many years.

But of course this was just another stinking pile of crap from another pro-Zionist special agent working for B’nai Brith along with Abrams and Warman. As it turned out later on I found that Det – Cst Wilson had been working with these zio-rats for many years before and all of this sudden new charge and arrest, etc. was nothing less than a further extension of their earlier attempts to shut me down and put me in jail in order to keep the truth about the Zionists hidden from the general public.

So please bear this in mind as you read through the list of vicious attacks perpetrated upon innocent people who have had their rights and freedoms suppressed, spent time in jail, and had their computers and files and firearms seized and their bank accounts drained all because of this one entity who should have been disbarred years ago and prevented from engaging in any legal activities.

Richard Warman is the epitome of all that is wrong with our Canadian legal system and anyone who has ever been harassed, threatened or victimized by this serial psychopathic complainer should be absolved of all accusations and convictions, their names cleared by the federal court and financially compensated for any and all legal costs incurred during their lengthy battles to retain their fundamental rights as given by Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. As an associate suggested after reading my initial comments here, “An application should be made, if it has not been done already, to have Warman declared a ‘Vexatious Litigant’ – there is ample precedent I think for this where an individual has persistently abused the system, an offence of which Warman is guilty, in spades!  The fact that he has been clearly motivated by malice and personal financial gain and assists a subversive political lobby, would reinforce the application.”
Nothing less in terms of redress ought to be considered when it comes to Richard Warman. Apart from disbarment, a healthy jail sentence of say five years ought to give this traitorous Zionist ackey enough time to reflect on his actions and prepare for a new career upon his release.

With the end of 2012 only hours away I’d like to take one final parting shot at this whole sordid affair known as Zionism. After years and years of researching its fundamentals and observing its ideology in action I’ve come to the only conclusion that I feel any honest, decent human being could be expected to reach. Zionism is, in truth, a mental disease. It’s a psychotic, delusional state of mind wherein adherents to its core cognitive structure and values – all contingent upon a mental belief that one small segment of the human family or species is somehow above and separate from all the rest of humanity – tend to behave in a cult-like fashion in order to outwardly express this political (psycho-mental philosophy) doctrine; one that sees no wrong in the destruction and murder and terrorization of any and all other human beings who stand in the way of its ultimate fulfillment. I can also state with added assurance that the new year will see more and more reasonable, intelligent and caring, loving individuals come to a similar conclusion as the weight of evidence backing such a contention grows heavier and heavier and the Zionist Beast grows more and more desperate and deranged in its behaviour.

God grant that we will stop it before the destruction gets beyond our control.
The best to all of you in 2013!

Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″

________________________________

From:  Marc Lemire <marc@lemire.com>

Subject:  Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach:  Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits
Date:  31 December, 2012 1:01:18 AM PST

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach:
Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits
http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html
http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

Richard Warman is one of Canada’s leading serial complainants.  Richard Warman described his tactic of filing complaints as “Maximum Disruption” in a speech he gave to a group called Anti-Racist Action.  According to Mr. Warman; “This approach involved working with the police, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and other organizations to create “maximum disruption” within what he perceives to be the Neo-Nazi movement in Canada.”

Here is a list of some of the lawsuits and other complaints he has filed:

—————————————————–

 

People Richard Warman has sued or threatened to sue

 

Alphabetically sorted

 

	Person	Court file # or Source
1)	3535991 Canada Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
2)	Andrea Rondeau	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
3)	Andrew Spencer (Droid1963)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
4)	Arnie Lemaire	Ontario Court File No. 09-46638
5)	Banyen Books	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
6)	BC Libraries Association	Macleans Magazine: April 21, 2008
7)	Biosfaire	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
8)	Black Press Group Ltd.	http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=684
9)	Boule De Neige	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
10)	Bridge of LovePublications	Ontario Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
11)	Byron Tau	http://btau.blogspot.com/2008/04/my-own-tiny-role-in-canadas-biggest.html
12)	Canadian Association for Free Expression	Ontario Court File No: 04-CV-26550SR
13)	Canoe Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
14)	Canwest Digital Media	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
15)	Canwest Global Communications Corp	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
16)	Canwest Interactive	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
17)	Canwest Limited Partnership	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
18)	Canwest Mediaworks Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
19)	Canwest Mediaworks Publications Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
20)	Canwest Publishing Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
21)	Catherine McMillan	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
22)	Constance Fournier	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
23)	Constance Fournier	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
24)	Constance Fournier	Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
25)	Cowichan Valley Citizen	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
26)	Crossroads Television System Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 10-49969
27)	Dan Lepage (SaskBigPicture)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
28)	Eternal Moment Bookstore	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
29)	Ezra Levant	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
30)	Ezra Levant	Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
31)	Ezra Levant	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
32)	Ezra Levant	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
33)	Fivefeetoffury.com	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
34)	Freedominion.ca	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
35)	Freedominion.ca	Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
36)	Global TV Calgary	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
37)	Global TV Lethbridge	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
38)	Jason Bertucci (Faramir)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
39)	Jason Ouwendyk	Ontario Small Claims Court File No. 03-SC-081720
40)	John Doe (conscience)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
41)	John Doe (HR-101)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
42)	John Doe (Klinxx)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
43)	John Doe (Padraigh)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
44)	Jonathan Kay	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
45)	Kamloops Public Library	BC Civil Liberties Press Release:http://www.bccla.org/pressreleases/04libelandslander.htm
46)	Kathy Shaidle	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
47)	Kathy Shaidle	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
48)	Kelly McParland	Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
49)	Knowledge Bookstore	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
50)	Mark Fournier	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
51)	Mark Fournier	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
52)	Mark Fournier	Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
53)	Michael Coren	Ontario Court File No. 10-49969
54)	Michael Coren	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
55)	Michael Veck	Ontario Court File No. CV-10-410527
56)	National Post Company	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
57)	National Post Company	Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
58)	Northern Alliance	Ontario Small Claims Court File No. 03-SC-081720
59)	Paul Fromm	Ontario Court File No: 04-CV-26550SR
60)	Preferred Network	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
61)	Quebecor Media Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
62)	Quebecor Media Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
63)	Quesnel Cariboo Observer (Newspaper)	http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=684
64)	Roger Smith (Peter O’ Donnell)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
65)	Russell McOrmond	http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/2603
66)	Seekers Books	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
67)	Shirley Skolos	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
68)	Smalldeadanimals.com	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
69)	Sun Media Corporation	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
70)	Sun Media Corporation	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
71)	Sun TV News General Partnership	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
72)	The McGill Tribune	http://btau.blogspot.com/2008/04/my-own-tiny-role-in-canadas-biggest.html
73)	Thompson Nicola Regional Public Libraries	Macleans Magazine: April 21, 2008
74)	Tom Kennedy	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
75)	Toronto Public Library	Toronto Public Library:  MATERIALS REVIEW COMMITTEE RECONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS SUMMARY – 2002
76)	TVA Group Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
77)	Vancouver Public Library	BC Civil Liberties Press Release:http://www.bccla.org/pressreleases/04libelandslander.htm
78)	Victoria Indymedia	http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/3102
79)	Victoria Public Library	BC Civil Liberties Press Release:http://www.bccla.org/pressreleases/04libelandslander.htm
80)	Walker Morrow	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
81)	William Grosvenor	Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-40460SR

 

 

Lawsuits filed under Canada’s Copyright Act

 

 

1)	Richard Warman and National Post v Mark and Constance Fournier	Federal Court of Canada:  T-784-11
2)	Richard Warman and National Post v Mark and Constance Fournier	Federal Court of Appeal:  A-395-12

 

 

Section 13 Complaints by Richard Warman

Cases before the CHRC and/or Canadian Human Rights Tribunal

 

 

1	T726_3102	FRED KYBURZ
2	T998/11804	Eldon Warman
3	T869/11903	Alexan Kulbashian,
4	T869/11903	James Scott Richardson,
5	T869/11903	Tri-city Skins.com,
6	T869/11903	Canadian Ethnic Cleansing Team,
7	T869/11903	Affordable Space.com
8	T1021/0205	Tomasz Winnicki
9	T1072/5305	Craig Harrison
10	T1071/5205	Peter Kouba
11	T1088/6905	Glenn Bahr
12	T1087/6805	Western Canada for Us
13	T1104/8505	Terry Tremaine
14	20031846	Alex Di Civita
15	20031844	Liz Lampman
16	T1095/7605	Bobby Wilkinson
17	T1095/7605	“Canadian Nazi Party”
18	T1106/8705	Jessica Beaumont
19	T1073/5405	Marc Lemire
20	20031956	Freedomsite .org
21	T1090/7105	Melissa Guille
22	T1090/7105	Canadian Heritage Alliance
23		Ciaran Paul Donnelly
24	20030360	WCOTC (World Church of the Creator)
25	T1217/2907	Jason Ouwendyk
26	T1216/2807	Northern Alliance

 

 

Criminal Complaints by Richard Warman

 

1	Alexan Kulbashian	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
2	Arthur Topham	http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=1405
3	Bill White	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Warman
4	Ciarian Donnelly	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
5	Craig Harrison	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
6	Freedomsite	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
7	Glenn Bahr	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
8	James Richardson	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
9	Jessica Beaumont	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
10	Marc Lemire	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
11	Peter Kouba	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
12	Terry Tremaine	www.freedominion.ca/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=159251
13	William Grosvenor	Warman Speech – University of Moncton – March 16, 2010

 

 

 

• Please note, for all cases; please refer to the original source material.  In the case of the Libel suits, where the source is indicated as a court file, that is an actual lawsuit Warman has filed.  Where the source is something other, like a URL, please refer to the originating material.  This may or may not be a lawsuit or threatened lawsuit by Warman.  The truths of the statements are via the websites.
• Please refer to the original source material.  This document consists of an overview of cases which (it appears that) Warman has filed or threatened.  This is not a complete list.  There may be many other cases in all categories, including criminal complaints, libel complaints, Section 13 cases, etc.
• If any mistakes are made of this page, please send an email to; marc@lemire.com for correction.

 

 

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach:

Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits

http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html